EVALUATING USEFULNESS AND FUNCTIONALEFFICAY OF MRI AS A DIAGNOSTIC TOOL FOR WOMEN WHO HAVE IRREGULAR MENSTRUAL FLOW BUT NO GRAVIDITY

Abstract

Background: there are many distinct and complex causes of irregular uterine bleeding, as well as differential diagnoses. Histopathologic analyses are seen as debatable by tav and tas, which makes mri, a non-invasive, cutting-edge imaging modality, a trustworthy tool for accurately diagnosing irregular uterine haemorrhage. Aim: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the use and effectiveness of MRI in patients with abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB).

Methods: after documenting a thorough history and doing a systemic examination, 102 patients with abnormal uterine bleeding who were between the ages of 21 and 85 who had undergone previous surgery were evaluated in this prospective clinical research. All of the individuals then had mris after this. The MRI diagnosis, underlying medical issues, age, parity, and the desire for more pregnancies all played a role in the treatment approach.

Result: The majority of participants were between the ages of 31 and 50, with a parity of 2. Study participants' duration complaints were acute for less than six months in 22.54% (n = 23) of them, and chronic for more than six months in 77.45% (n = 79) of them. In 11.76% (n=12), 20.58% (n=21), 32.35% (n=33), and 35.29% (n=36) of the research patients, the bleeding pattern was PMB, IMB, HPMB, and HMB. In 9.80% (n=10), 15.68% (n=16), 10.78% (n=11), 14.70% (n=15), 12.74% (n=13), and 19.60% (n=20) of the research participants, pressure symptoms, dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, discharge per viginum, heaviness in the lower abdomen, and pain in the lower abdomen were reported, respectively. Out of the five research respondents, 4.90% claimed no compliance.

Conclusion: The present study concludes that in subjects where clinical diagnosis is not confirmatory, sonography is decisive, even in subjects with no symptoms and normal findings. MRI is an accurate and promising imaging modality.