EVALUATING PHYSICIAN’S AND PATIENT’S PERCEPTION AND CONCERN REGARDING GENERIC MEDICINES IN A TERTIARY CARE TEACHING HOSPITAL
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56802/efxhxj57Keywords:
Bioequivalence, Branded Medicines, Life-Threatening Conditions, PhysiciansAbstract
Background: Generic medicines are cost-effective alternatives to branded counterparts, offering significant savings to
patients and the healthcare system. However, their utilization is heavily influenced by the perceptions of key stakeholders:
physicians (prescribers) and patients (consumers). This study aimed to evaluate the knowledge, attitude, and concerns of
physicians and patients regarding generic medicines in a tertiary care teaching hospital.
Methodology: This was a cross-sectional, observational study conducted in the Department of Pharmacology at
BLDEU’s Shri B.M. Patil Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, Vijayapura, over two months. A target sample
size of 400 subjects (Medical Officers, Residents, Specialists, and Patients) was planned using a structured questionnaire
for physicians and a vernacular interview for patients.
Results: The response rate was 92.5% (n=370). Physicians (n=120) generally acknowledged generics' cost-effectiveness
(85%) and bioequivalence (78%). However, a significant minority (45%) expressed concerns about the quality and
manufacturing standards of generic products, and 55% were reluctant to prescribe them for life-threatening conditions.
Patients (n=250) largely agreed that generics were cheaper (75%), but a majority (60%) believed generics had lower
efficacy and quality compared to branded medicines. Only 30% of patients reported asking their doctor for a generic
alternative. Both groups identified the lack of public awareness and physician preference for branded drugs as major
barriers.
Conclusion: Despite a baseline understanding of generic medicine's financial benefits, both physicians and patients in
the tertiary care setting harbor significant concerns regarding quality, efficacy, and safety. Targeted educational
interventions for both prescribers (emphasizing bioequivalence data) and consumers (addressing quality mistrust) are
crucial to increase the rational utilization of generic medicines.




